I would like to introduce my cause to you!!!!

Are there any law students who take on pro bono cases?  I would like to introduce myself. My name is Timothy Adams and I am serving a life sentence for a hearsay Conspiracy drug case. I am in need of any law students who are interested in challenging fraud perpetrated by an attorney in my case during my habeas 2255 proceedings. Pro se litigants are not giving any liberal construction in the 4th Circuit court of appeals. I say this because I have filed over (5) Independent actions for fraud upon the court and at no time did the district Judge address whether the affidavit submitted during my 2255 proceedings constitutes fraud upon the court under the Hazel- Atlas doctrine under Rule 60(b) saving clause. The question was never addressed.

The letter!!!!

Dear Law students: I received a letter today dated July 19, 2011 postmarked July 27, 2011 from the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR). In their response, they stated that it is, however, the policy of this office to refrain from investigating issues or allegations that could have been or still may be addressed in the course of litigation, unless a court has made a specific finding of misconduct by a GOJ attorney or law enforcement agents or there are present other extraordinary circumstances. Based on our review of your correspondence, we have determined that your allegations falls into this category, there is no evidence that the court has made a finding of misconduct, and there are no other extraordinary circumstances presents.law students, respectfully, I submitted clear and convincing proof that the United States Attorney's office submitted two fraudulent affidavits opposing Mr. Adams' 2255 motion, which are material to the out come of his proceedings. I submitted clear and convincing evidence that the affidavits submitted were false and misleading and material. I submitted clear proof that I filed complaints to the United States Attorneys office and the complaints were not answered. I filed complaints to the (OPR), the inspector General office, and the Attorney Generals office in over a ten year span and received no response. I even filed over five (5) Independent Actions to the District Court for Fraud upon the court to set aside the 2255 judgment . Each time the District Court never addressed whether the affidavit's submitted by the United States attorney's office were in fact fraud. Instead, my claims were simply denied under the wrong standard, each time in the District court and the court of appeals. This was my reasons for filing the complaints because this questions the district court's ability to function impartially. If the district court does not address this issue then who addresses it? For the (OPR) to say that the court has made no specific findings of misconduct by a DOJ Attorney does mean that my claims of fraud upon the court were never addressed. I filed a reply back to their office. I am seeking help from any of you law students who practice law pro bono. I have clear and convincing evidence of fraud upon the court and my case warrants the public's attention. If there's ant one who can help , please feel free to contact me.

Thank you.

Cardozo law school, I am in search of a law student who is interested in doing pro-bono work for my case please go to my facebook page to check out my blogs that have been posted follow this link @ http://facebook.com/T.Adams44.  Thanks for your time and Patience.

Timothy Adams

My friends, I wanted to take the time out thanking you for accepting my friendship on facebook. I was very happy, relieved and shock to know that people are reaching out to the public. To explain my situation, I've been incarcerated for (17) years serving a (LIFE) sentence for a hearsay (one) count indictment, drug conspiracy case. There was no physical evidence in my case. My case was based on convicted felons trading testimony for a time reduction of their own case. I have been a model inmate and have never been written up for any infractions of the penal system. However how does one begin to measure the loss of (17) years. It is immeasurable. At best one could list the events that were missed and allow one to imagine the emotion involved. My father died. My sister and brother died. My son was murdered. My two grandchildren were born. My children moved from toddlers, to pre-teens, to teens, and then adults. I did not rear my children.

Again the cost to my family is immeasurable. The statistics on children reared without their fathers is prolific and consistent. What hurdles may I expect for my daughters? Not to mention that my mother Ms. Alice Adams is elderly who still, despite the prostrations of her son, drives hours to visit me, sends money she does not have so that I may be able to call her on occasion. She suffers still with the desire to see her son released from prison, as does my children my siblings and of course my fiancée Ms. Jeanniene Brown, editor of "True Story". I need legal assistance in a very serious situation that is of public importance.

The judgment in my case can never be said to be final, this is because the judgment rendered in my Habeas Corpus 2255 was material and fraudulent. There's a case supporting my position called "Hazel- Atlas, the Court postulated a duty incumbent upon the courts, rather than simply authority, to act when confronting a fraud on the court:[s]surely it cannot be that preservation of integrity of the judicial process must always wait upon the diligence of litigants. The public welfare demands that the agencies of public justice be not so impotent that they must always be mute and helpless victims of deception and fraud.

I am asking this law School to assist me to re-open my case pro-bono. You can use my case as a class project because my case is a very important public issue.  Over (13) years, the district court judge, nor the United States Attorney’s office would acknowledge any wrong doing. Although I have submitted clear and convincing evidence, no one took the steps to protect the public's welfare from fraud and deception.

If there is any information needed any proof, I will be glad to submit upon request.

I thank you again and I pray that Justice will be done in my case.

Timothy Adams

Reg. No 42380-019

P.O. Box 420

F.C.I. Fairton NJ 08320

Ms. Jeanniene Brown, editor of True story.

(347) 394-9566     

Spoke to Brad Heath at USA Today

Hello my friends....I just wanted to keep you posted about my my case involving the fraudulent misconduct that took place in my case. I spoke to Mr. Brad Heath from the USA Today on August 8, 2011, and that he made a request that I forward all of my documents to him for an investigation of my case.

As soon as his investigation is concluded  , I will make an announcement to you. I would ask that you help me by emailing him at bheath@usatoday.com(or) call (202) 906-8177.

I thank you very much and I am praying for the better.
Timothy Adams
Reg. No 42380-019
P.O. Box 420
F.C.I. Fairton
Fairton N.J. 08320

Attention: DONATIONS NEEDED FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE!!

Attention: DONATIONS NEEDED FOR LEGAL ASSISTANCE!!

I would like to bring your attention to the matter of Timothy Adams ( 6:94-cr-302-3.

The United States Attorney in this case allowed my former counsel, Charles Alexander, to submit two fraudulent affidavits to the court. I posses clear and convincing evidence to dispute the validity of the affidavits submitted fraudulently to the court.

The United States Attorney for the middle District of North Carolina relied on these fraudulent documents and submitted them them to court in support of an erroneous position. Furthermore, the office of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina could have easily accessed the information that clearly demonstrated the affidavit submitted by Alexander not once but twice was a fraud upon the court.

I believe that the attorney constructed these fraudulent affidavits, the United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina accepted these documents because I am African American. I believe that authorities in this area do not hesitate to violate the rights of African Americans (or) any other poor persons because they feel as if the offended party has little recourse to correct this situation as my case clearly demonstrates. I have fought for my rights for 16 half years with little avail and hired numerous attorney only to be robbed out of my money.

The failure of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of North Carolina to perform professional diligence in ensuring the information delivered to the court was accurate has cause a very long delay in allowing me an opportunity to be properly heard in the Middle District of North Carolina. I have submitted numerous motions to this court. my most important assertion "Fraud Upon the Court" has not been addressed by the court.

Besides the damage done to my own life as a result of this act, allowing a fraud upon the court is a very serious ethical issue as it serves to undermine our legal system as whole.

I need your help in exposing the District court judge who allowed this to accrue without addressing these very serious allegations.

I am posting blog's daily and seeking donations to be my towards my defense. I am seeking to hire a law firm who would represent me and would seek justice.

We need to send a message to those attorneys and judges. Those who tampers with the administration of justice in the manner indisputably shown here involves far more than an injury to a simple litigant. It is wrong against the institution set up to protect and safeguard institutions in which Fraud cannot be complacently be tolerated consistently with the good order of society. Thus, the improper influence exerted by the attorney's fraudulent affidavit drove a stake through the heart of the court's integrity, and the court's failure to correct such a grave error directly questions its ability to function impartially.

Since the court has not acknowledged, or even ruled, on whether Mr. Adams trial attorney's affidavit constituted fraud upon the court, Mr. Adams need the public's help and donations to hire a law firm.

As soon as Mr. Adams locate a law firm, he will seek donations to be delivered to the firm.
If the public has any questions regarding to this subject, feel free to leave a comment.
Thank you.

Timothy Adams.

My struggles with the Judiciary Conference of the 4th Circuit

To Whom It May Concern

Sometimes it feels as if an unjust act will never be uncovered. However, we believe if we keep bringing the matter before the attention of those who should want to see justice that some day justice will indeed prevail. It is with this spirit of hope and attitude that we ask you to review the matter of Timothy Adams and his struggle with the Judiciary Conference of the 4th Circuit.

Please find attached Mr. Adam's complaint for what is a Fraud upon the court. Our court system and its system of laws are integral components in maintaining order in our society. Without this system there is a great possibility that our society would quickly crumble and succumb to anarchy.

Confidence in our legal system is paramount to its function as a cornerstone in providing an atmosphere ripe to achieve the American dream. In order to maintain this confidence justice must be fair and applied to all our citizenry equally. No other issue has the power to erode our confidence in the legal system than a fraud committed on the court by one of its officers. A lawyer bound by oath and rules of professional conduct must be candid in his assertions to the court. When a lawyer speaks in court he is presumed to be telling the truth in it's entirety. This presumption is a privilege and responsibility for the lawyer. This privilege must be honored in the most reverent manner and in the minutest of detail.

With that said I would like to ask that a full investigation be made regarding Mr. Adam's situation. It was through the use of a private investigator that Mr. Adams was able to uncover information that expands the knowledge of what occurred in his case.

Specifically, Mr. Adams asserts that defense attorney Charles J. Alexander II, represented ''Velvet Jetter'' a woman who met with the agents involved in investigation the Adams case. Ms. Jetter was a known associate of the co-conspirators in the Adams trial a Mr. Patrick Harvey. When Mr. Adams raised this issue in a pro se 2255 motion that  this constituted a conflict of interest Mr. Alexander answered that he had not represented Ms. Jetter but an unnamed associate in his firm, who no longer worked there did. This statement is the root of the fraud upon the court.

We raise a point of investigation here that the matter before the court was too important, as Mr. Adams actual life hung in the balance, for Mr. Alexander to simply say an unnamed associate, who by chance no longer worked at his firm represented Ms. Jetter. We assert that this associate should have been named and Mr. Adams should have had an opportunity to question this associate as to his participation in the Jetter matter. Especially since all the document in Ms. Jetter's case does in fact bear Mr. Alexander's signature and identify him as the attorney on record. Furthermore Mr. Alexander should have most likely been disqualified as an attorney for Mr. Adams considering his or as he stated an unnamed associate in his firms association with Ms. Jetter.

The court states that this information was not material when in fact on the heels of Adams conviction in federal court, Ms. Jetter's case was dismissed for cooperating with federal authorities. More importantly this dismissal was orchestrated by Ms. Jetter's attorney, Alexander, the same attorney who represented the plaintiff in his federal trial. The same attorney who advised Ms. Jetter to speak with Drug Enforcement Agency(DEA) agent, Cynthia Wilcox. The DEA agent testified at Adam's trial, and was cross examined by attorney Alexander.

Please see Exhibit A, It is the affidavit submitted to the court by Defense Attorney Charles J. Alexander II. Exhibit B, is signed by Ms. Jetter. On 9/4/98 indicating Charles Alexander II was in fact her attorney of record. Ms. Jetter also says that she was question about Mr. Adams by a  DEA agent. Exhibit C is a motion to suppress submitted on behalf of Ms. Jetter and signed by Charles J. Alexander II, noting him as her attorney of record. Exhibit D is a waiver of arraignment submitted on  behalf of Ms. Jetter dated 2/9/95 signed by Ms. Jetter and Attorney Charles J. Alexander noting him as the attorney of record. Exhibit E is a dismissal of charges regarding Ms. Jetter for cooperating with federal authorities.

The evidence here bears out that the connection between Jetter and attorney Alexander is clear. Mr. Adams should have been made aware of the fact that Charles Alexander II clearly represented Ms. Jetter. Mr. Adams should have been afforded the opportunity to determine if in fact any information was gathered from Ms. Jetter regarding a supposed connection with Mr. Adams. It is also more than possible that Ms. Jetter may have been able to refute any conspiracy to distribute drugs between Mr. Harvey and Mr. Adams. So while it is apparent that Mr. Alexander was aware of the existence of Ms. Jetter he never informed Mr. Adams of this person, substantially damaging his ability to fully represent himself in his trial.

It is our belief that the fraudulent statement the U.S. Attorney's office allowed Alexander to submit to this tribunal when properly reviewed will warrant Mr. Adams a new trial.

Thank you for your most serious consideration of this matter. Please allow this letter to stand as a complaint against Judge Tilley for his stubborn refusal to address the fraud upon the court in ties case over a 13 year span.

Sincerely,

Jeanniene Brown
Telephone#394-347-9566
Timothy Adams
P.O. Box 420
Fairton, NJ 08320

Alice Adams
377 Montgomery St.
Apt #D-6
Brooklyn, NY 11225
718-493-7925