Letter to President Obama

Letter to President Obama 

Att: President Obama.

Dear President Obama:

I would like to bring to your attention to the matter of Timothy Adams case No. (6:94-cr-302-3).

Mr. Adams was charged and convicted of Conspiracy to distribute crack Cocaine oover 16 years ago. He has been a model inmate. he has never had any serious infractions of the penal system. however how does one begin to measure the loss of 15 year 16/half years. it is measureable. At best one could list the events that were missed and allow one to imagine the emotion involved. Mr. Adams father died. his sister died. His son died. His first and second grandchild was born. his children moved from toddlers, to pre-teens,to teens, and then adults. mr adams did not rear his chidren. he did not graduate college. He did not have an opportunity to own property.

Again the cost to the family of Mr. Adams is immeasurable. the staistics on children reaed without their fathers is prolific and consistent. what hurdles may we expect for his sons based on the information? What hurdles may we expect for his daughters? not to mention that his mother is an elderly woman who still, despite the prostrstions of her son, drives hours to visit him, sends money she does not have so that he may call her on occasion. She suffers still with desire to see her son released from prison, as does his chidren his siblings and of course his spouse.

It has always been our contention that The U.S. Attorneys Office and Former Trial Attorney Charles J. Alexander II was not candid with the tribunal and thus the conviction of Mr. Adams and his Habeas Corpus 2255 was tained by Fraud committed upon the court.

Please review the attached infomation:


   Exhibit A  Affidavit by Attorney Charles J. Alexander II stating the case for witness was handled by an "unnamed" associate in his firm who no longer  works there.
   Exhibit B  Signed statement  dated 9/4/98 by witness that indicates Charles J. Alexander II was in fact her Attorney of record, advised witness to speak with DEA agents and was in fact questioned regarding inmate Adams.
    Exhibit C  Motio to suppress submitted and signed by Charles J. Alexander II and noting him as the attorney of record dated2/9/95
   Exhibit D Waiver of arraignment submitted on behalf of witness dated 2/9/95. Signed by witness and Charles J. Alexander II noting him as the attorney of record
   Exhibit E Dismissal of charges against witness for cooperating with federal authorities.
   Exhibit F  11/7/94 search warrant for the residence of witness.

Evidence here bears out that the connection between Witness and Attorney Alexander is clear. Mr. Adams should have been made aware of the fact that Charles Alexander II clearly represented Witness. Mr. Adams should have been afforded an opportunityh to determine if in fact he wanted to continue with Alexander as his attorney in light of his association with Witness. Mr. Adams should have been afforded an opportunity to determine if any information gathered from witness regarding a supposed connection with Mr. Adams. It is also more than possible that witness may have been able to refute any conspiracy to distribute drugs between Mr. Harvey and Mr. Adams. So while it is apparent that Mr. Alexander was aware of the existence of witness he never informed Mr. Adams of this person, substantially damaging the ability of Mr. Adams to make good decisions regarding his representationand to fully represent himself at trial.

Some would say that our legal system is flawed.  No matter how flawed, it is our system to love, honor and change as the process allows and society sees fit. These flaws will at times beg up the question will an unjust act ever be uncovered. The wonderful thing about our system is there are checks and balances. Even when these checks and balances don't work wrongs can be righted when those charged to protect, enforce and interpret our laws are sufficiently interested.

Confidence in our legal system is paramount to its function as a cornerstone in providing an atmosphere ripe to achieve the American dream. In order to maintain this confidence justice must be fair and applied to all our citizenry equally. No other issue has the power to erode our confidence in the legal system than a fraud committed on the court by one of its officers. A lawyer bound by oath and rules of professional conduct must be candid in his assertions to the court. When a lawyer speaks in a court he is presumed to be telling the truth in its entirety. This presumption is a privilege and responsibility for the lawyer. This privilege must be honored in the most reverent manner and in the minutest of detail.

I ask that you review the attached information with valuable additional years of experience, court precedent, and through the eyes of the Adams mother, children, siblings and spouse. Here stands the opportunity to right what we believe to be a wrong and allow our justice system to work according to the laws that society has deemed appropiate because otherwise we are left with the question, does the ends justify the means.

If you require any additional information you may reach me at: F.C.I Fairton  P.O.Box 420 fairton NJ, 08320

Sincerely,

Timothy Adams
Reg. No . 42380-019