To Whom It May Concern
Sometimes it feels as if an unjust act will never be uncovered. However, we believe if we keep bringing the matter before the attention of those who should want to see justice that some day justice will indeed prevail. It is with this spirit of hope and attitude that we ask you to review the matter of Timothy Adams and his struggle with the Judiciary Conference of the 4th Circuit.
Please find attached Mr. Adam's complaint for what is a Fraud upon the court. Our court system and its system of laws are integral components in maintaining order in our society. Without this system there is a great possibility that our society would quickly crumble and succumb to anarchy.
Confidence in our legal system is paramount to its function as a cornerstone in providing an atmosphere ripe to achieve the American dream. In order to maintain this confidence justice must be fair and applied to all our citizenry equally. No other issue has the power to erode our confidence in the legal system than a fraud committed on the court by one of its officers. A lawyer bound by oath and rules of professional conduct must be candid in his assertions to the court. When a lawyer speaks in court he is presumed to be telling the truth in it's entirety. This presumption is a privilege and responsibility for the lawyer. This privilege must be honored in the most reverent manner and in the minutest of detail.
With that said I would like to ask that a full investigation be made regarding Mr. Adam's situation. It was through the use of a private investigator that Mr. Adams was able to uncover information that expands the knowledge of what occurred in his case.
Specifically, Mr. Adams asserts that defense attorney Charles J. Alexander II, represented ''Velvet Jetter'' a woman who met with the agents involved in investigation the Adams case. Ms. Jetter was a known associate of the co-conspirators in the Adams trial a Mr. Patrick Harvey. When Mr. Adams raised this issue in a pro se 2255 motion that this constituted a conflict of interest Mr. Alexander answered that he had not represented Ms. Jetter but an unnamed associate in his firm, who no longer worked there did. This statement is the root of the fraud upon the court.
We raise a point of investigation here that the matter before the court was too important, as Mr. Adams actual life hung in the balance, for Mr. Alexander to simply say an unnamed associate, who by chance no longer worked at his firm represented Ms. Jetter. We assert that this associate should have been named and Mr. Adams should have had an opportunity to question this associate as to his participation in the Jetter matter. Especially since all the document in Ms. Jetter's case does in fact bear Mr. Alexander's signature and identify him as the attorney on record. Furthermore Mr. Alexander should have most likely been disqualified as an attorney for Mr. Adams considering his or as he stated an unnamed associate in his firms association with Ms. Jetter.
The court states that this information was not material when in fact on the heels of Adams conviction in federal court, Ms. Jetter's case was dismissed for cooperating with federal authorities. More importantly this dismissal was orchestrated by Ms. Jetter's attorney, Alexander, the same attorney who represented the plaintiff in his federal trial. The same attorney who advised Ms. Jetter to speak with Drug Enforcement Agency(DEA) agent, Cynthia Wilcox. The DEA agent testified at Adam's trial, and was cross examined by attorney Alexander.
Please see Exhibit A, It is the affidavit submitted to the court by Defense Attorney Charles J. Alexander II. Exhibit B, is signed by Ms. Jetter. On 9/4/98 indicating Charles Alexander II was in fact her attorney of record. Ms. Jetter also says that she was question about Mr. Adams by a DEA agent. Exhibit C is a motion to suppress submitted on behalf of Ms. Jetter and signed by Charles J. Alexander II, noting him as her attorney of record. Exhibit D is a waiver of arraignment submitted on behalf of Ms. Jetter dated 2/9/95 signed by Ms. Jetter and Attorney Charles J. Alexander noting him as the attorney of record. Exhibit E is a dismissal of charges regarding Ms. Jetter for cooperating with federal authorities.
The evidence here bears out that the connection between Jetter and attorney Alexander is clear. Mr. Adams should have been made aware of the fact that Charles Alexander II clearly represented Ms. Jetter. Mr. Adams should have been afforded the opportunity to determine if in fact any information was gathered from Ms. Jetter regarding a supposed connection with Mr. Adams. It is also more than possible that Ms. Jetter may have been able to refute any conspiracy to distribute drugs between Mr. Harvey and Mr. Adams. So while it is apparent that Mr. Alexander was aware of the existence of Ms. Jetter he never informed Mr. Adams of this person, substantially damaging his ability to fully represent himself in his trial.
It is our belief that the fraudulent statement the U.S. Attorney's office allowed Alexander to submit to this tribunal when properly reviewed will warrant Mr. Adams a new trial.
Thank you for your most serious consideration of this matter. Please allow this letter to stand as a complaint against Judge Tilley for his stubborn refusal to address the fraud upon the court in ties case over a 13 year span.
Sincerely,
Jeanniene Brown
Telephone#394-347-9566
Timothy Adams
P.O. Box 420
Fairton, NJ 08320
Alice Adams
377 Montgomery St.
Apt #D-6
Brooklyn, NY 11225
718-493-7925
No comments:
Post a Comment